Nova Publishers
My Account Nova Publishers Shopping Cart
HomeBooksSeriesJournalsReference CollectionseBooksInformationSalesImprintsFor Authors
  Top » Catalog » Books » Most recent entries » My Account  |  Cart Contents  |  Checkout   
Quick Find
Use keywords to find the product you are looking for.
Advanced Search
What's New? more
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: Recognition, Differential Diagnosis and Long-Term Effects
Shopping Cart more
0 items
Shipping & Returns
Privacy Notice
Conditions of Use
Contact Us
01.Sociology of Interprofessional Health Care Practice: Critical Reflections and Concrete Solutions
02.Precision Gear Shaving
03.Social Capital
04.Sex Chromosomes: Genetics, Abnormalities, and Disorders
05.Problem Solving with Delphi - CD included
06.Suicide and the Creative Arts
07.Taliban in Pakistan: A Chronicle of Resurgence
08.Textbook of Therapeutic Cortical Stimulation
09.Seabed Morphology of the Russian Arctic Shelf
10.Solid Waste Management and Environmental Remediation
Notifications more
NotificationsNotify me of updates to Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Recent Trends
Tell A Friend
Tell someone you know about this product.
Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Recent Trends
Retail Price: $59.00
10% Online Discount
You Pay:

Editors: Yule Kim
Book Description:
The Supreme Court has expressed an interest “that Congress be able to legislate against a background of clear interpretive rules, so that it may know the effect of the language it adopts.” This report identifies and describes some of the more important rules and conventions of interpretation that the Court applies. Although this report focuses primarily on the Court’s methodology in construing statutory text, the Court’s approach to reliance on legislative history are also briefly described.
In analyzing a statute’s text, the Court is guided by the basic principle that a statute should be read as a harmonious whole, with its separate parts being interpreted within their broader statutory context in a manner that furthers statutory purpose. The various canons of interpretation and presumptions as to substantive results are usually subordinated to interpretations that further a clearly expressed congressional purpose.
The Court frequently relies on “canons” of construction to draw inferences about the meaning of statutory language. For example, in considering the meaning of particular words and phrases, the Court distinguishes between terms of art that may have specialized meanings and other words that are ordinarily given a dictionary definition. Other canons direct that all words of a statute be given effect if possible, that a term used more than once in a statute should ordinarily be given the same meaning throughout, and that specific statutory language ordinarily trumps conflicting general language. “Ordinarily” is a necessary caveat, since any of these “canons” gives way if context reveals an evident contrary meaning.
Not infrequently the Court stacks the deck, and subordinates the general, linguistic canons of statutory construction, as well as other interpretive principles, to overriding presumptions that favor particular substantive results. The Court usually requires a “clear statement” of congressional intent to negate one of these presumptions. A commonly invoked presumption is that Congress does not intend to change judge-made law. Other presumptions disfavor preemption of state law and abrogation of state immunity from suit in federal court. Congress must also be very clear if retroactive application of a statute or repeal of an existing law is intended. The Court tries to avoid an interpretation that would raise serious doubts about a statute’s constitutionality. Other presumptions that are overridden only by “clear statement” of congressional intent are also identified and described.
This report sets forth a brief overview of the Supreme Court’s approach to statutory interpretation. The bulk of the report describes some of the Court’s more important methods of construing statutory text, and the remainder briefly describes the Court’s restraint in relying on legislative history. The Court has expressed an interest “that Congress be able to legislate against a background of clear interpretive rules, so that it may know the effect of the language it adopts.” In reading statutes, the Supreme Court applies various rules and conventions of interpretation, and also sometimes superimposes various presumptions favoring particular substantive results. Other conventions assist the Court in determining whether or not to consider legislative history. Although there is some overlap and inconsistency among these rules and conventions, and although the Court’s pathway through the mix is often not clearly foreseeable, an understanding of interpretational possibilities may nonetheless lessen the burdens of statutory drafting and aid Congress in choosing among various drafting options.
Executive Order 12988, which provides guidance to executive agencies on preparing legislation, contains a useful checklist of considerations to keep in mind when drafting legislation. Many items on the checklist are topics addressed in this report, and many of the court decisions cited under those topics have resulted from the absence of clear statutory guidance. Consideration of the checklist may facilitate clarification of congressional intent and may thereby lessen the need for litigation as a means to resolve ambiguity in legislation.
Of course, Congress can always amend a statute to require a result different from that reached by the Court. In interpreting statutes, the Court recognizes that legislative power resides in Congress, and that Congress can legislate away interpretations with which it disagrees. Congress has revisited statutory issues fairly frequently in order to override or counter the Court’s interpretations. Corrective amendment can be a lengthy and time-consuming process, however, and Congress in most instances will probably wish to state its intent clearly the first time around.

Table of Contents:

Chapter 1. Statutory Text, pp. 1-2

Chapter 2. Canons of Construction, pp. 3-11

Chapter 3. Overriding Presumptions, pp. 13-22

Chapter 4. Miscellany, pp. 23-27

Chapter 5. Legislative History, pp. 29-33

Chapter 6. Signing Statements, pp. 35-37


   Binding: Softcover
   Pub. Date: 2009
   Pages: 86 pp.
   ISBN: 978-1-60692-997-1
   Status: AV
Status Code Description
AN Announcing
FM Formatting
PP Page Proofs
FP Final Production
EP Editorial Production
PR At Prepress
AP At Press
AV Available
Special Focus Titles
01.Violent Communication and Bullying in Early Childhood Education
02.Cultural Considerations in Intervention with Women and Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence
03.Chronic Disease and Disability: The Pediatric Lung
04.Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Health: New Research
05.Fire and the Sword: Understanding the Impact and Challenge of Organized Islamism. Volume 2

Nova Science Publishers
© Copyright 2004 - 2021

Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Recent Trends