Table of Contents: Preface pp. i-viii
Facing Facts: Best Practices for Common Uses of Facial Recognition Technologies
(Federal Trade Commission)pp. 1-28
Statement of Senator Al Franken, Chairman, Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 29-34
Testimony of Jennifer Lynch, Staff Attorney, Electronic Frontier Foundation. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 35-66
Statement of Nita A. Farahany, Professor of Law, Duke Law School. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 67-78
Testimony of Alessandro Acquisti, Associate Professor, Carnegie Mellon University. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 79-92
Statement of Brian Martin, Director of Biometric Research, MorphoTrust USA. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 93-100
Testimony of Robert Sherman, Manager of Privacy and Public Policy, Facebook. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 101-108
Testimony of Maneesha Mithal, Associate Director, Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, Federal Trade Commission. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 109-118
Statement of Jerome M. Pender, Deputy Assistant Director, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 119-124
Testimony of Sheriff Larry Amerson, President, National Sheriffs' Association. Hearing on "What Facial Recognition Technology Means For Privacy and Civil Liberties" pp. 125-128
Index pp. 129-136 |