Nova Publishers
My Account Nova Publishers Shopping Cart
HomeBooksSeriesJournalsReference CollectionseBooksInformationSalesImprintsFor Authors
  Top » Catalog » Books » Medicine » Hematologic Disorders » Deep Vein Thrombosis: Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatments Chapters » My Account  |  Cart Contents  |  Checkout   
Quick Find
Use keywords to find the product you are looking for.
Advanced Search
What's New? more
Central Asia: Perspectives and Present Challenges
Shopping Cart more
0 items
Shipping & Returns
Privacy Notice
Conditions of Use
Contact Us
Notifications more
NotificationsNotify me of updates to Combination of pretest clinical probability score and different (pp. 59-72)
Tell A Friend
Tell someone you know about this product.
Combination of pretest clinical probability score and different (pp. 59-72) $100.00
Authors:  (Takashi Yamaki)
Prompt diagnosis of venous deep vein thromboembolism (VTE) is mandatory, but only 25% of suspected cases are confirmed by objective testing. In this background, the D-dimer testing with high negative predictive value represents an excellent triage test in patients with suspected VTE. In general, enzyme-liked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) offers the best of current D-dimer assay for sensitivity. Latex quantitative assay and whole-blood assay might also represent valid alternative for
exclusion of VTE. Recently, a combination of pretest clinical probability (PTP) score and D-dimer testing has been considered validated as a diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This strategy is specifically validated for patients who have low PTP. Even the combination of low PTP and a normal D-dimer concentration can be considered a safe strategy to withhold anticoagulation in patients with suspected VTE.
D-dimer cutoff value also affects the discriminating power. The sensitivity could be improved by lowering the cutoff value, but the subsequent decrease in specificity would lead to a large number of false-positive results. On the contrary, D-dimer assays with very high specificity provide fewer false-positive results, but they are less sensitive for VTE and cannot be used to exclude the disease in all patients. In this background, we analyzed if varying the D-dimer cutoff according to PTP would exclude VTE in more patients than using the single D-dimer cutoff point. Using latex agglutination assay, we found that D-dimer cutoff points of 2.6, 1.1 and 1.1μg/mL were selected for the low, moderate and high PTP groups among 886 patients with suspected DVT. In the low PTP group, specificity increased from 48.9% to 78.2% (P <0.0001) with use of the different D-dimer cutoff value. In the moderate and high risk PTP groups, however, the different D-dimer levels did not achieve substantial improvement. Regardless, overall venous duplex scanning could have been reduced by 43.0% using different D-dimer cutoff points. Even in patients with proven PE, a combination of a specific D-dimer level and PTP score is most effective in the low PTP patients in excluding DVT.
In summary, a combination of PTP score and different D-dimer cutoff provides an effective means in terms of avoiding a large number of unnecessary venous duplex scanning in suspected symptomatic DVT in the low PTP for DVT. 

Available Options:
This Item Is Currently Unavailable.
Special Focus Titles
01.Violent Communication and Bullying in Early Childhood Education
02.Cultural Considerations in Intervention with Women and Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence
03.Chronic Disease and Disability: The Pediatric Lung
04.Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Health: New Research
05.Fire and the Sword: Understanding the Impact and Challenge of Organized Islamism. Volume 2

Nova Science Publishers
© Copyright 2004 - 2021

Combination of pretest clinical probability score and different (pp. 59-72)